Father Must Pay Child Maintenance During Trial, Rules Lahore High Court

1 min read

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has upheld a conditional remand order in a family dispute, ruling that a father seeking to reopen ex parte proceedings cannot avoid paying maintenance — particularly to a minor child — during fresh trial proceedings.

Justice Raheel Kamran dismissed a petition filed by Faizan Kareem, who had challenged a Dec 18, 2025 order passed by an appellate court (additional district and sessions judge) in Ahmadpur East.

The appellate court had set aside earlier ex parte decrees and remanded the case to a family court for fresh adjudication, subject to the condition that the petitioner pay past and future maintenance as previously determined.

The dispute originated from a suit filed in 2022 by the petitioner’s estranged wife, Yasmin Khan, seeking maintenance for herself and their minor daughter, Bakhtawar. She alleged that the petitioner had expelled them from the home and failed to provide financial support.

The family court proceeded ex parte against the father and, in 2024, awarded Rs6,000 per month each to the wife and the child. Subsequently, the appellate court enhanced the maintenance to Rs10,000 per month, along with a 10 per cent annual increase for the child.

The petitioner later challenged the ex parte decree. His application was initially dismissed but was accepted on appeal. However, the appellate court remanded the matter to the family court for a fresh trial, subject to payment of maintenance.

The petitioner argued that he had divorced the respondent in 2017, rendering her ineligible for maintenance. He also contended that the maintenance amount was excessive and that the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to impose such a condition.

Justice Kamran rejected these arguments and drew a clear distinction between the rights of the minor child and those of the wife.

The judge ruled that a father’s obligation to maintain his minor child is absolute, continuous, and independent of the outcome of litigation. He observed that a child’s needs for food, education, and healthcare do not cease during legal proceedings.

Published in Dawn, April 24th, 2026.

Previous Story

AJK Cabinet Okays Rs3.7bn Education Package

Next Story

Fuel Crisis puts Education of Children with Special Needs at Risk

Latest from Blog

K-P Orders Safety Checks at Schools

PESHAWAR: The Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa government on Oct 15 directed the Communication and Works (C&W) Department to constitute technical teams to inspect all government school buildings across the province following the deadly collapse of a classroom roof at a private school in Peshawar. Earlier in the day, a roof collapse at Al-Khair…

Peshawar Mourns after Roof Collapse Snuffs Out 31 Lives

• Teacher, 30 students among the dead; around 30 injured treated at Lady Reading Hospital • Chief secy forms fact-finding committee to probe incident, suggest preventive measures • Governor tells PM school owner in custody; safety audit of schools across province ordered • President, PM call for best treatment for…

Over 130 Sexual Assault, Abduction Cases Registered in Capital This Year

ISLAMABAD: The capital police registered at least 132 sexual assault and 709 kidnapping cases in the federal capital from January 1 to September 30, 2026, sources told Dawn. One of the cases, the victim was kidnapped, taken out of Islamabad and murdered in KP. Recently, a 26-year-old woman was abducted…

Infant Boy Tests Positive for Mpox in Sindh as Tally Rises to 94

KARACHI: The city reported its first mpox case involving an infant boy on Wednesday evening as the total number of people affected by the disease in Sindh this year rose to 94. Sources said the 40-day-old baby boy was currently under treatment at the Sindh Infectious Diseases Hospital & Research…

Private Schools in Balochistan Threaten Contempt Plea Over Fee Ban

QUETTA: The Balochistan Private Schools Associations Alliance has called on the Deputy Commissioner (DC) Quetta, West, to immediately clarify the legal basis for restricting the collection of three months’ school fees at a time, warning that they would be compelled to file a contempt of court petition if the matter…
Go toTop