Father Must Pay Child Maintenance During Trial, Rules Lahore High Court

1 min read

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has upheld a conditional remand order in a family dispute, ruling that a father seeking to reopen ex parte proceedings cannot avoid paying maintenance — particularly to a minor child — during fresh trial proceedings.

Justice Raheel Kamran dismissed a petition filed by Faizan Kareem, who had challenged a Dec 18, 2025 order passed by an appellate court (additional district and sessions judge) in Ahmadpur East.

The appellate court had set aside earlier ex parte decrees and remanded the case to a family court for fresh adjudication, subject to the condition that the petitioner pay past and future maintenance as previously determined.

The dispute originated from a suit filed in 2022 by the petitioner’s estranged wife, Yasmin Khan, seeking maintenance for herself and their minor daughter, Bakhtawar. She alleged that the petitioner had expelled them from the home and failed to provide financial support.

The family court proceeded ex parte against the father and, in 2024, awarded Rs6,000 per month each to the wife and the child. Subsequently, the appellate court enhanced the maintenance to Rs10,000 per month, along with a 10 per cent annual increase for the child.

The petitioner later challenged the ex parte decree. His application was initially dismissed but was accepted on appeal. However, the appellate court remanded the matter to the family court for a fresh trial, subject to payment of maintenance.

The petitioner argued that he had divorced the respondent in 2017, rendering her ineligible for maintenance. He also contended that the maintenance amount was excessive and that the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to impose such a condition.

Justice Kamran rejected these arguments and drew a clear distinction between the rights of the minor child and those of the wife.

The judge ruled that a father’s obligation to maintain his minor child is absolute, continuous, and independent of the outcome of litigation. He observed that a child’s needs for food, education, and healthcare do not cease during legal proceedings.

Published in Dawn, April 24th, 2026.

Previous Story

AJK Cabinet Okays Rs3.7bn Education Package

Next Story

Fuel Crisis puts Education of Children with Special Needs at Risk

Latest from Blog

Population Growth Can Become ‘Social Bomb’

• Ahsan Iqbal proposes incentives under NFC for provinces managing population growth • Projections say population can reach 389.9 million by 2050 even under a slow-decline scenario ISLAMABAD: Planning and Development Minister Ahsan Iqbal on May 12 warned that unchecked population growth could become a “social bomb” and a major…

Hepatitis C Elimination Programme Launched To Screen, Treat Millions Nationwide

ISLAMABAD: Health authorities on Wednesday formally launched the Prime Minister’s National Programme for the Elimination of Hepatitis C from the Islamabad Capital Territory, aiming to screen 1.6 million people in the federal capital within six months and eventually test more than 164 million people across the country in phases as…

Gender Progress

On May 11, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that that custody of a child cannot be granted to the grandmother or paternal aunt solely on the basis of the mother’s second marriage. The ruling came in connection with a case regarding the custody of a nine-year-old child. Custody had initially…

KP Health Dept Seeks More Funds For Free Cochlear Implants of 1,000 Children

PESHAWAR: Health department has sought more funds from government to provide cochlear implants to about 1,000 deaf and dumb children under Sehat Card Plus scheme. Officials at Health Secretariat told Dawn that government was providing Rs4 billion every month for free treatment of patients under Sehat Card Plus scheme that was given…
Go toTop