Father Must Pay Child Maintenance During Trial, Rules Lahore High Court

1 min read

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has upheld a conditional remand order in a family dispute, ruling that a father seeking to reopen ex parte proceedings cannot avoid paying maintenance — particularly to a minor child — during fresh trial proceedings.

Justice Raheel Kamran dismissed a petition filed by Faizan Kareem, who had challenged a Dec 18, 2025 order passed by an appellate court (additional district and sessions judge) in Ahmadpur East.

The appellate court had set aside earlier ex parte decrees and remanded the case to a family court for fresh adjudication, subject to the condition that the petitioner pay past and future maintenance as previously determined.

The dispute originated from a suit filed in 2022 by the petitioner’s estranged wife, Yasmin Khan, seeking maintenance for herself and their minor daughter, Bakhtawar. She alleged that the petitioner had expelled them from the home and failed to provide financial support.

The family court proceeded ex parte against the father and, in 2024, awarded Rs6,000 per month each to the wife and the child. Subsequently, the appellate court enhanced the maintenance to Rs10,000 per month, along with a 10 per cent annual increase for the child.

The petitioner later challenged the ex parte decree. His application was initially dismissed but was accepted on appeal. However, the appellate court remanded the matter to the family court for a fresh trial, subject to payment of maintenance.

The petitioner argued that he had divorced the respondent in 2017, rendering her ineligible for maintenance. He also contended that the maintenance amount was excessive and that the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to impose such a condition.

Justice Kamran rejected these arguments and drew a clear distinction between the rights of the minor child and those of the wife.

The judge ruled that a father’s obligation to maintain his minor child is absolute, continuous, and independent of the outcome of litigation. He observed that a child’s needs for food, education, and healthcare do not cease during legal proceedings.

Published in Dawn, April 24th, 2026.

Previous Story

AJK Cabinet Okays Rs3.7bn Education Package

Next Story

Fuel Crisis puts Education of Children with Special Needs at Risk

Latest from Blog

IHC Seeks Answers on Action under ‘Zainab’ Child Protection Law

ISLAMABAD: More than five years after the passage of a landmark child protection law, key provisions of the Zainab Alert, Response and Recovery Act, 2020 — including the agency meant to issue rapid alerts for missing children — remain unimplemented, the Islamabad High Court was told on June 4. During the…

Woman, Two Others Arrested for ‘Selling’ Girl in Swabi

SWABI: The police on 3rd June recovered a girl, who was allegedly sold for Rs50,000 to a man from Punjab, and arrested three accused. The incident occurred in the Chota Lahor tehsil, the police said, adding that the girl’s father, Ayaz Khan, was reportedly kept in the dark about the…

Conviction Rate in Rape Cases in Sindh Climbs to 22pc in Five Years

• Official report links legal reforms, specialised investigation units and gender-based violence courts for sharp increase • Police cite better evidence handling and coordination with medico-legal officers; majority of cases still end in acquittals KARACHI: The conviction rate in rape cases in Sindh rose to 22 per cent in 2025…

KP to set up 72 Chief Minister Model Schools

PESHAWAR: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Sohail Afridi has directed the education department to immediately initiate work on the legal framework for the construction of 72 Chief Minister Model Schools across the province. He stated this while chairing a meeting on the initiative, which is part of the government’s education reform…

SC Upholds Death Sentence Awarded to Child Rapist, Killer

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has upheld a sentence awarded to a child rapist and a murderer, ruling that individuals who voluntarily become intoxicated cannot claim exemption from criminal liability. “Intoxication caused by one’s own negligence or recklessness does not excuse the offence,” affirmed Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar in a…
Go toTop