Father Must Pay Child Maintenance During Trial, Rules Lahore High Court

1 min read

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has upheld a conditional remand order in a family dispute, ruling that a father seeking to reopen ex parte proceedings cannot avoid paying maintenance — particularly to a minor child — during fresh trial proceedings.

Justice Raheel Kamran dismissed a petition filed by Faizan Kareem, who had challenged a Dec 18, 2025 order passed by an appellate court (additional district and sessions judge) in Ahmadpur East.

The appellate court had set aside earlier ex parte decrees and remanded the case to a family court for fresh adjudication, subject to the condition that the petitioner pay past and future maintenance as previously determined.

The dispute originated from a suit filed in 2022 by the petitioner’s estranged wife, Yasmin Khan, seeking maintenance for herself and their minor daughter, Bakhtawar. She alleged that the petitioner had expelled them from the home and failed to provide financial support.

The family court proceeded ex parte against the father and, in 2024, awarded Rs6,000 per month each to the wife and the child. Subsequently, the appellate court enhanced the maintenance to Rs10,000 per month, along with a 10 per cent annual increase for the child.

The petitioner later challenged the ex parte decree. His application was initially dismissed but was accepted on appeal. However, the appellate court remanded the matter to the family court for a fresh trial, subject to payment of maintenance.

The petitioner argued that he had divorced the respondent in 2017, rendering her ineligible for maintenance. He also contended that the maintenance amount was excessive and that the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to impose such a condition.

Justice Kamran rejected these arguments and drew a clear distinction between the rights of the minor child and those of the wife.

The judge ruled that a father’s obligation to maintain his minor child is absolute, continuous, and independent of the outcome of litigation. He observed that a child’s needs for food, education, and healthcare do not cease during legal proceedings.

Published in Dawn, April 24th, 2026.

Previous Story

AJK Cabinet Okays Rs3.7bn Education Package

Next Story

Fuel Crisis puts Education of Children with Special Needs at Risk

Latest from Blog

APTA Seeks Early Regularisation of Primary Teachers

PESHAWAR: All Primary Teachers Association (APTA) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa president Azizullah Khan has urged the provincial government to complete the regularisation of 14,000 teachers at the earliest and implement its decision to upgrade primary school teachers. Talking to reporters here on Friday, he said a separate directorate for primary education was…

Reducing the burden

PAKISTAN’S students do not need voluminous textbooks especially in the early stages; they need better learning. The Punjab government’s decision to revise the curriculum from pre-primary to Grade 5, reduce textbook volume by 25pc, and shift students away from rote learning is therefore a welcome step. The current education system…
textbook load reduced

New Primary Curriculum to Cut Textbook Burden by 25pc

LAHORE: The Punjab government on Thursday approved a new curriculum from Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) to Grade 5 for implementation from the academic year 2027, with the authorities claiming that the revised syllabus would reduce the burden of textbooks and shift students away from rote learning. The approval…

Polio’s Stubborn Pockets

PAKISTAN enters its latest polio campaign in a better position than it did a year ago. Only four cases have been reported so far in 2026, compared with 31 last year. That is real progress, but it would be a mistake to read too much into the decline. As vaccinators…
Go toTop