Madrassa Bill

1 min read

The rift over the assent for the madrassa bill has come to a pass. The President of the Republic has finally signed it into law after a hiatus, which apparently was aimed at arm-twisting an ally of the coalition government. The JUIF, which was part of the controversial 26th amendment to the Constitution, had grabbed the religious school’s registration law as a concession for throwing its weight behind the legislation package. With the Societies Registration Act 2024 becoming a statute, all the JUIF-led seminaries will be registered by, and accountable to, the Ministry of Industries, as per the party’s wish. This makes it mandatory for the seminaries to file an annual report detailing their education curriculum and finances.

The question is: what prevented the government from instantly signing it into law and instead dragging it to almost becoming a crisis for itself? The plot has thickened as the beleaguered government has now settled for an understanding with other religious factions, who run madrassas too, enabling them to register their wards with the Ministry of Education. Under a new thaw, an ordinance has been promulgated to oblige the anti-JUIF factions paving the way for a parallel paradigm of religious schools registration and monitoring. That simply speaks of the government’s inability to prevail over one of its crucial allies, resulting in hoodwinking a formally passed legislation.

The coalition dispensation played on both sides of the wicket to grab a deal, which many believe was meant to belittle the JUI-F for reasons of exigency. The bill’s outcome, which is now in a dichotomy status, should have better been sent back to the bicameral urging it to address the loopholes and make it more comprehensive. But the President preferred to hold it back as long as he could and then gave it his assent for a proverbial deal. This exposure has also confirmed the haste with which the 26th Amendment was bulldozed, making it a point of pondering for the opposition and the judiciary to sit in judgment.

Editorial  published in the Express Tribune on 1st January 2025

Previous Story

School’s Establishment Welcomed

Next Story

Schools Demand Policy Reform On Fee Structures

Latest from Blog

Learning From A Child

MY daughter, who is seven and a half, is my latest teacher. She is in grade two. She gets a fair bit of homework and she is kind enough that she lets me sit with her when she is doing her homework. I started sitting with her to see if…

NA HR Body Concerned Over Begging, Child Abuse And Drug Use

ISLAMABAD: The Standing Committee of the National Assembly on Human Rights has expressed grave concern over the rapid growth of child begging, child abuse, and the increase of drugs in private and government educational institutions. The committee directed the Ministry of Human Rights and the National Commission on the Rights…

Climate Resolutions 2025

2025 will be a year of new openings and possibilities for Pakistan. Several initiatives started during the outgoing year will approach completion and offer opportunities to integrate economic and climate priorities. For Pakistan, economic and climate vulnerabilities reinforce each other and hence they must be addressed simultaneously. We will learn…

Enhanced Form B Introduced With Security Features For Children Aged 10+

ISLAMABAD: On the instructions of Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, it was decided on 01-January-2025 to introduce Form B with special security features for children above the age of 10 for the first time in history. As part of these new security features, fingerprints and photographs of children aged 10 and…
Go toTop