Madrassa Bill

1 min read

The rift over the assent for the madrassa bill has come to a pass. The President of the Republic has finally signed it into law after a hiatus, which apparently was aimed at arm-twisting an ally of the coalition government. The JUIF, which was part of the controversial 26th amendment to the Constitution, had grabbed the religious school’s registration law as a concession for throwing its weight behind the legislation package. With the Societies Registration Act 2024 becoming a statute, all the JUIF-led seminaries will be registered by, and accountable to, the Ministry of Industries, as per the party’s wish. This makes it mandatory for the seminaries to file an annual report detailing their education curriculum and finances.

The question is: what prevented the government from instantly signing it into law and instead dragging it to almost becoming a crisis for itself? The plot has thickened as the beleaguered government has now settled for an understanding with other religious factions, who run madrassas too, enabling them to register their wards with the Ministry of Education. Under a new thaw, an ordinance has been promulgated to oblige the anti-JUIF factions paving the way for a parallel paradigm of religious schools registration and monitoring. That simply speaks of the government’s inability to prevail over one of its crucial allies, resulting in hoodwinking a formally passed legislation.

The coalition dispensation played on both sides of the wicket to grab a deal, which many believe was meant to belittle the JUI-F for reasons of exigency. The bill’s outcome, which is now in a dichotomy status, should have better been sent back to the bicameral urging it to address the loopholes and make it more comprehensive. But the President preferred to hold it back as long as he could and then gave it his assent for a proverbial deal. This exposure has also confirmed the haste with which the 26th Amendment was bulldozed, making it a point of pondering for the opposition and the judiciary to sit in judgment.

Editorial  published in the Express Tribune on 1st January 2025

Previous Story

Outgoing Year Proves Grim For Education

Next Story

Schools Demand Policy Reform On Fee Structures

Latest from Blog

Maryam Introduces Aghosh Programme For Women

LAHORE: Under Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz’s first-ever Aghosh program, pregnant women and mothers of children under 2 will get Rs23,000 each. “Health of a mother and her child requires special attention, a healthy mother guarantees a healthy family,” said Maryam while introducing the Aghosh program to provide medical facilities…

NCRC Representatives Summoned In Missing Children’s Case

ISLAMABAD: The Constitu­tio­nal Bench of the Supreme Court on 18th March summoned representatives of the National Commission on the Rights of Child (NCRC) in a case moved to seek a declaration that police should treat the issue of missing children as a cognisable offence. Headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, the…

Punjab CM Launches Initiatives For Special Children

LAHORE: Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz Sharif has introduced a series of groundbreaking initiatives aimed at improving the lives of special children across the province. These initiatives encompass healthcare, education, employment, and safety measures to ensure the well-being and empowerment of children with disabilities. As part of these efforts, 40,000…

Media Urged To Play Role In Child Rights Protection

LAHORE: The participants in a session on strengthening media engagement for improving child rights were of the view that the media can play a pivotal role in ensuring the effective implementation of children’s rights by fostering accountability and public awareness. They said that media professionals can shed light on compliance…

Biological Fathers Must Support Kids Born Out Of Wedlock, Rape: LHC

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has ruled that biological fathers are financially responsible for children born out of wedlock or as a result of rape, provided their paternity is established. Justice Ahmad Nadeem Arshad issued a 15-page detailed verdict on a petition, filed by Muhammad Afzal, directing the trial…
Go toTop