Fazl Rejects Child Marriage Bill, Announces Protest Across Country

1 min read

PESHAWAR: Rejecting the Child Marriage Restraint Bill, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUIF) chief Maulana Fazlur Rahman on 01-June-2025 said that ease was being created for the promotion of adultery in the country, while the process of nikah was being made difficult under the pretext of so-called legislation.

“There is no restriction of age for marriage in Islam. The only restriction is the attainment of puberty, which may occur at the age of 10, 12 or 14,” he said while addressing a news conference here.

He claimed that deliberate efforts were being made to erode the Islamic identity of the country. Previous legislation, he said, had been attributed to pressure from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) or the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

The recent legislation aimed at prohibiting the marriage of individuals under 18 was also based on certain sections of the UN Charter, he alleged. “It means that the country is still not free and remains under the clutches of a neo-colonial system,” he added.

The Maulana said that the so-called legislation was against the spirit of the teachings of the Holy Quran and Sunnah and constituted a blatant violation of the basic principles of the Constitution, which clearly stated that no law shall be enacted that was repugnant to the Holy Quran and Sunnah. He added that due to the flawed policies of the rulers, the country was not only losing its Islamic identity but also its democratic character. This, he argued, strengthened the narrative of militant organisations that believed that the parliament had failed to deliver.

“It is strange that anti-Islam legislation is being passed in an Islamic republic,” he remarked. He recalled that a similar attempt had been made during the Musharraf regime to promote adultery in the name of women’s rights.

The current law, too, he claimed, would make the process of nikah more difficult, which would ultimately lead to an increase in adultery.

The Maulana said that the Council of Islamic Ideology and religious scholars from all schools of thought had rejected the legislation as contrary to Islamic teachings, the Holy Quran and the Sunnah.

He declared that the JUIF rejected the law and would launch a massive protest campaign against it across the country. The first major political gathering in this regard would be held in Hazara Division on June 29, he announced.

Published in News Daily on 02 June 2025.

 

polio
Previous Story

Polio Case Detected In GB’s Diamer, Virus Genetically Linked To Karachi

Next Story

First Polio Case From GB Takes Year’s Tally To 11

Latest from Blog

Climate Threat Looms Over Children

UNITED NATIONS: More than one billion children face at least three overlapping climate hazards, with 34 million in Pakistan, UNICEF warned Monday, while highlighting the disproportionate impact in some regions of the world. For the report, the UN agency cross-referenced data showing where the roughly 2.4 billion children on the…

Measles Claims 53 Children

KARACHI: A fresh surge in measles cases has taken a dangerous turn in Sindh, with more than 2,000 children infected so far this year and 53 losing their lives due to complications. Speaking to The Express Tribune, paediatrician Dr Khalid Shafi said that the nationwide death toll from measles has…

Pakistan Economic Survey 2025 – 26

During the fiscal year 2025-26, Pakistan’s economy demonstrated significant resilience and restored macroeconomic stability, achieving a provisional GDP growth rate of 3.70 percent compared to 3.18 percent the previous year. This positive trajectory was driven by a robust recovery across all major economic sectors, with agriculture expanding by 2.89 percent…

Parents Can’t Waive Minors’ Future Rights Thru’ Compromise: LHC

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has ruled that parents cannot surrender or extinguish future rights of a minor child, including maintenance and inheritance, through a private agreement or compromise before a family court. Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani issued the ruling deciding a petition filed by Waleed Arshad challenging judgments…
Go toTop